New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act and Case Law
The New jersey Consumer Fraud Act and the relevant cases are covered in this section. The most important case is Cox v. Sears because the Supreme Court reinvigorated the Consumer Fraud Act with this case/analysis.
As a general matter the act is to be liberally construed because it is remedial leglslation enacted for the benefit of the consumer. Many cases have required this analysis under the act and the Administrative Code sections. Litigating this area of law can be complex and required an intennsive understanding of the case law and the Administrative Code.
As a general matter the act is to be liberally construed because it is remedial leglslation enacted for the benefit of the consumer. Many cases have required this analysis under the act and the Administrative Code sections. Litigating this area of law can be complex and required an intennsive understanding of the case law and the Administrative Code.
- Cox v. Sears 138 NJ 2 (1994)
- Cuesta v. Classic Car 358 N.J.Super 512 (App.Div 2003)
- Weinberg v. Sprint Corp., 173 N.J. 233 (2002)
- Gross v. TJH Automotice 380 N.J.Super 176 (App.Div 2005)
- Delaney v. Garden State Auto Mall, 318 N.J.Super. 15 (App.Div 1995)
- Miller v. American Family Publishing, 284 N.J. Super 67, 76 (App. Div. 1995)
- Silver v. Autos of Amboy 267 N.J. Super 546 (App. Div. 1993)
- Cannon v. Cherry Hill 161 F.Supp.2d 362
- Berrie v. Toyota 267 N.J.Super 161 (App.Div 1993)